Why:
- No existing study that looks at the Fitbit data in terms of the quality of the:
- Density of the data (i.e., how much data)
- Longitudinality of the data (i.e., for how long)
- Bias of the data (underlying social cohort, intra and/or inter-individual differences)
What:
- We will explore the existing Fitbit data from the ABCD study and seek to understand:
- Sociodemographic data
- The Fitbit data that is available
- Stemming from the data exploration:
- Bias analysis
How:
- Examine the Fitbit-specific data from the ABCD
Resource Stack
Resource | Location |
---|---|
Point of Contact | |
GDrive | |
Project Tracking | https://github.com/aid4mh/abcd_dataAnalysis/issues |
Code Repo |
Reference Papers:
- Concurrent and prospective associations between fitbit wearable-derived RDoC arousal and regulatory constructs and adolescent internalizing symptoms
- Current, future and potential use of mobile and wearable technologies and social media data in the ABCD study to increase understanding of contributors to child health
- Performance of a commercial multi-sensor wearable (Fitbit Charge HR) in measuring physical activity and sleep in healthy children
- ABCD Study Main Paper - The ABCD study: understanding the development of risk for mental and physical health outcomes
- Tutorial - https://abcd-repronim.github.io/
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-0224-8